larserik (asker) Dec 8, 2020:

found it I found the Edit button and deleted the name...

larserik (asker) Dec 8, 2020:

more sorry I should not post the name of the deceased, of course. Shame on me. No way to delete it now, right?

larserik (asker) Dec 8, 2020:

Sorry The context I posted is an exact copy from the document, no added typos. As a whole, the document is a bit sloppy, language-wise. Evidently made from a form, and not always adapted to the actual circumstances. In some places "notari/ja", in other places "notarja", which is correct. In some places "dhuratdhënësja" with spelling variants and a verb in plural, or "dhuratdhënësit" with a verb in singular. So, the word "është" after "kontributi[t]" might well be another mistake.

The sentence after the one I already posted goes like this:
Dhuratëdhënësja deklaron se këtë dhuratë e bën në shenjë të pjesës së trashegimisë dhe legut sipas deklarimit të bashkëshortit të saj të ndjerë X, respektivisht dhurimin e tërë pjesës së sajë tek fëmijët dhe se të njejtën e konsideron si pasuri sipas legut verbal të bashkëshortit të saj tek fëmijet.

What is given by this contract is a plot of land. So "kontributi" seems (to me) to be referring to this plot of land.

Denis Haska Dec 8, 2020:

There are a few spelling mistakes which hamper understanding. Can you provide the whole sentence, without mistakes?
Like this, I would understand that:
1. the late husband donated some contributions (titles of ownership) to his wife
2. the late husband had a contribution into something (which is missing).