Presentation	Welcome Address	Time: 13:00 to 13:10
Panel	The Role of the Lawyer-Linguist in the Language Services Industry	Time: 13:15 to 14:00
Panel	The Lawyer-Linguist as Interpreter	Time: 14:10 to 14:40
Presentation	Working as a Freelance Lawyer-Linguist for the UN, States and Other Non-State Actors	Time: 14:50 to 15:30
Panel	The Lawyer-Linguist as CEO	Time: 15:40 to 16:10
Panel	Training for Lawyer-Linguists	Time: 16:20 to 17:00
Virtual powwow	Chat room	Time: 17:00 to 19:05
Panel	Foreign Language Document Review: State of the Industry	Time: 17:10 to 17:40
Presentation	Closing Remarks	Time: 17:50 to 18:00

Thank you, very useful, even working as CEO which did not concern me much helped as I gathered a lot of information from the questions asked/answers provided and I especially enjoyed the session about working for the UN. Pity I could not follow the Foreign Language Document Review:State of the Industry. All the speakers were very knowledgeable in their areas and the moderator conducted the sessions marvellously. Hope to see you next year.

---

Dear Susanne,
thank you for all the useful information. I studied economy not law but it gave me some ideas.
Kind regards
Marianne Vizkelety dr

---

Thank you for all the useful information I obtained during this event! Keep up the good work!

---

Thank you for a very useful information and points of reference.

Kind Regards,
Piotr Cempa DPSI

---

Leave feedback →

Search chat logs

Search:

Chat session: All sessionsChat room

Show my chats only

Chat session is based on session start and end time. There may be some overlap.

Time	From	To	Content
11:50 Apr 8, 2014	Blandine-ATRIL: 1459982	All	what you are listing here is available in DVX3
11:50 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	because the other two things you mention are in DVX3
11:51 Apr 8, 2014	Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408	All	recognized terms are not marked in any way in the source segment
11:51 Apr 8, 2014	hnoronha: 556405	All	Here is my take on this: I have been in this industry for 29 years and was the guy who first requested Iko and Jochen to create a tool that can remember a sentence that was done at Trados in 1985.
11:52 Apr 8, 2014	hnoronha: 556405	All	DVX is the most user-friendly of all the tools but badly needs to move away from Access
11:52 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	Pavel: the highlighting of source terms found by AutoSearch is something we're considering
11:52 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	but most of the private feedback we've had from individual users is that this is actually not particularly useful and is quite distracting
11:53 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	so we'll obviously be making it optional
11:53 Apr 8, 2014	Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408	All	Both Trados and MemoQ have it as standard, but if you make it available in any form in Deja vu it will be greatly appreciated.
11:53 Apr 8, 2014	hnoronha: 556405	All	Trados database processing is 10 times faster; and the databases are smaller. The 2 GB limit on Access databases is unacceptable in a modern tool. MemoQ databases stink too - far too slow and unweildy
11:54 Apr 8, 2014	Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408	All	hnoronha – please, keep the conversation civil and respectful.
11:55 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	Pavel: what did Hildreth say?
11:56 Apr 8, 2014	Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408	All	Please, do not use words like 'stink', your point is clear even without making it too negative.
11:56 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	Hildreth: one of the main reasons why we didn't make the change in DVX3 was to allow for interoperability between DVX2 and DVX3
11:57 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	based on our experience when going from DV3 to DVX, and then from DVX to DVX2, it was clear that most people expected to versions to co-exist and interoperate
11:59 Apr 8, 2014	Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408	All	Back to the point: Deja vu x2's QA is unusable. Explained in detail here: http://www.proz.com/forum/d%C3%A9j%C3%A0_vu_support/230066-djv_x2_areas_to_improve_wishlist-page4.html
12:00 Apr 8, 2014	Nuri Razi: 941714	All	Hi Everybody
12:00 Apr 8, 2014	Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408	All	If a term is entered in the termbase as stand alone and also as part of an expression, the QA will issue a warning if both target terms are not used at the same time in the same segment.
12:01 Apr 8, 2014	Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408	All	Which makes no sense and is a huge waste of time in a big project.
12:01 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	Pavel: that sounds like a bug... it should only be marked as an error if it was in the Lexicon (which has a higher priority than the TB)
12:02 Apr 8, 2014	Drew MacFadyen: 601248	All	http://www.proz.com/virtual-conferences/604/program/9448 Déjà Vu X3 training for beginners will begin shortly
12:02 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	I'll make sure we check this and get this fixed ASAP
12:02 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	Hildreth, SQL Server can handle huge DBs, but is not particularly fast if you want to use it from a desktop application
12:03 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	so it makes sense for a server-based product (where the network itself is a bigger I/O bottleneck)
12:03 Apr 8, 2014	Daniel Benito: 1130548	All	but for a desktop application, something like sqlite is probably more appropriate